Live
Head to head

Claude 2 vs U-PaLM (540B)

Anthropic
Claude 2
July 2023
vs
Google
U-PaLM (540B)
October 2022
3.9×10²⁴Training compute (FLOP)2.5×10²⁴
$5MTraining cost--

Claude 2 (Anthropic) and U-PaLM (540B) (Google) are both frontier AI models. Claude 2 was published in July 2023 and U-PaLM (540B) in October 2022.

Claude 2 was trained on 3.9×10²⁴ FLOP, about 1.5x the compute of U-PaLM (540B) at 2.5×10²⁴ FLOP. Training compute is the closest available proxy for how much was invested in a model, though it says nothing on its own about how well that compute was spent.

These two models share no benchmark on which both have been scored, so no direct performance comparison is possible here. The specification table below is a comparison of inputs, not of results.

Specifications
Anthropic
Organization
Google
Jul 11, 2023
Published
Oct 20, 2022
3.9×10²⁴ FLOP
Training compute1.5x
2.5×10²⁴ FLOP
--
Parameters
540B
--
Dataset size
1.3B
--
Training hardware
Google TPU v4
--
Chips used
512
--
Training time
120 h
$5M
Training cost (2023 USD)
--
--
Training power draw
348.3 kW
API access
Accessibility
Unreleased
No
Open weights
No
United States
Country
United States
Related comparisons
SourceEpoch AI, 'AI Models'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved 2026-07-29 from https://epoch.ai/data/ai-models. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.