实时
Head to head

Claude 2 vs EXAONE 1.0

Anthropic
Claude 2
July 2023
vs
LG
EXAONE 1.0
December 2021
3.9×10²⁴Training compute (FLOP)1.7×10²⁴
$5MTraining cost$3M

Claude 2 (Anthropic) and EXAONE 1.0 (LG) are both frontier AI models. Claude 2 was published in July 2023 and EXAONE 1.0 in December 2021.

Claude 2 was trained on 3.9×10²⁴ FLOP, about 2.3x the compute of EXAONE 1.0 at 1.7×10²⁴ FLOP. Training compute is the closest available proxy for how much was invested in a model, though it says nothing on its own about how well that compute was spent.

These two models share no benchmark on which both have been scored, so no direct performance comparison is possible here. The specification table below is a comparison of inputs, not of results.

Specifications
Anthropic
Organization
LG
Jul 11, 2023
Published
Dec 14, 2021
3.9×10²⁴ FLOP
Training compute2.3x
1.7×10²⁴ FLOP
--
Parameters
300B
$5M
Training cost (2023 USD)1.8x
$3M
API access
Accessibility
Unreleased
No
Open weights
No
United States
Country
South Korea
Related comparisons
SourceEpoch AI, 'AI Models'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved 2026-07-29 from https://epoch.ai/data/ai-models. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.