In diretta
Humanity EngineCellular View
BPM
T+00:00
Cellular view

The cellular view of a warehouse rave

Louder than a club and packed tighter. Whatever forms here forms at touching distance.

The conditions of this room

Four numbers decide what a crowd does: how tightly it is packed, how loud it is, how fast alcohol arrives, and how much attention is available for the people beside you. Everything below is either a published figure or derived from one.

2.6 p/m²
Crowd density
Fruin F — crowd force propagates
Fruin (1971), Pedestrian Planning and Design
0.43 m/s
Walking speed
down from 1.34 m/s unimpeded
Weidmann (1993), Transporttechnik der Fussganger, ETH Zurich
106 dB(A)
Sound level
speech is not viable at conversational distance
Lane & Tranel (1971), J. Speech Hear. Res.; Hall (1966)
0.55 m
Speech range
intimate to personal zone
Hall (1966), The Hidden Dimension
1.3/person/h
Alcohol served
30 mg/100 ml after four hours
Widmark (1932); NIAAA standard drink definition
75%
Attention available
for the people physically beside you
Modelled parameter — see the note on attention below
6%
Just passing through
moving with a destination rather than standing
Modelled parameter
4 people
Conversation ceiling
speech groups fission beyond this
Dunbar, Duncan & Nettle (1995), Human Nature 6(1)

What those conditions do to people

A warehouse takes the nightclub formula and pushes both dials. Density rises to 2.6 people per square metre and the sound level to about 106 dB, which drops the speech range to 55 centimetres — the shortest of any room on this site, shorter even than front of stage.

It produces the highest raw encounter rate modelled: 17.9 per person per hour. That is not despite the collapsed speech range but partly because of it — the room is so packed that the number of people inside even a 55 centimetre radius stays high, and everyone is standing still rather than moving through.

The yield tells a different story. Those encounters convert to 599 lasting ties, marginally more than a nightclub and well behind a beer tent that generates fewer encounters in a far quieter room. Volume of contact and quality of contact are close to independent, and this room is the clearest demonstration.

What the model produces

Measured output from a standard run: 1,200 people, 4 hours of venue time, fixed seed, no parameter overrides. Every room on this site is run under identical conditions, so these figures are a like-for-like comparison rather than a set of individually flattering runs.

17.88
Encounters per person per hour
42,902
Encounters in four hours
16,111
Bridges between separate groups
599
Lasting ties left behind
297
Largest connected group
1,253
Encounters that soured

The crowd is a simulation and is presented as one. What is not invented are its constants: walking speed against density, the proxemic zones, the collapse of speech range with noise, the Widmark blood-alcohol curve and the conversational group limit all come from published work, cited above and listed in full in the engine.

Real places like this

Every gathering below is modelled as this kind of room. Attendance figures are published numbers for the period stated.

Questions

How loud is a warehouse rave?

Around 106 dB(A), above typical club levels of 95–110 dB and enough to reduce the intelligible speech range to roughly 55 cm.

Is a rave more social than a club?

It produces slightly more encounters per person per hour, because it is packed tighter and nobody is in transit. Lasting ties are close to identical, so the extra contact largely does not convert.

What happens to conversation at very high volume?

The intelligible distance collapses roughly exponentially with sound level. Raising your voice — the Lombard effect, about 0.5 dB gained per dB of noise — recovers only part of it.

How this is modelled

Each person is one cell with a position, a body mass, a Widmark distribution ratio, an openness trait and a reserve of energy. They walk at the speed the local density allows, drink at the rate the room serves, and when two of them stay within speech range long enough, a bond forms. Most bonds are nothing.

What separates an encounter that creates something from one that does not is whether it bridges two groups that were not previously connected. A tie inside an existing group mostly restates what that group already knows; a tie across a gap carries information neither side had. That distinction is Granovetter's, and it is the mechanic the whole model turns on.

One parameter has no citation and should be read as an assumption: attention, the share of a person available to whoever is beside them rather than to a stage, a road or a rite. It is the variable that separates a street crossing from a dancefloor at similar density, and it is the one this model asserts rather than borrows.

Weidmann (1993), Transporttechnik der Fussganger, ETH Zurich
Fruin (1971), Pedestrian Planning and Design
Hall (1966), The Hidden Dimension
Lane & Tranel (1971), J. Speech Hear. Res.; Hall (1966)
Widmark (1932); NIAAA standard drink definition
Sayette et al. (2012), Psychological Science 23(8)
Dunbar, Duncan & Nettle (1995), Human Nature 6(1)
Granovetter (1973), The Strength of Weak Ties, AJS 78(6)

The other rooms