In diretta
Head to head

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Minerva (540B)

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
June 2024
vs
Google
Minerva (540B)
June 2022
2.7×10²⁵Training compute (FLOP)2.7×10²⁴
$26MTraining cost--

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic) and Minerva (540B) (Google) are both frontier AI models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet was published in June 2024 and Minerva (540B) in June 2022.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was trained on 2.7×10²⁵ FLOP, about 9.8x the compute of Minerva (540B) at 2.7×10²⁴ FLOP. Training compute is the closest available proxy for how much was invested in a model, though it says nothing on its own about how well that compute was spent.

These two models share no benchmark on which both have been scored, so no direct performance comparison is possible here. The specification table below is a comparison of inputs, not of results.

Specifications
Anthropic
Organization
Google
Jun 20, 2024
Published
Jun 29, 2022
2.7×10²⁵ FLOP
Training compute9.8x
2.7×10²⁴ FLOP
--
Parameters
540.4B
--
Dataset size
26B
--
Training hardware
Google TPU v4
--
Chips used
1,024
--
Training time
696 h
$26M
Training cost (2023 USD)
--
--
Training power draw
698.4 kW
API access
Accessibility
Unreleased
No
Open weights
No
United States
Country
United States
Related comparisons
SourceEpoch AI, 'AI Models'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved 2026-07-29 from https://epoch.ai/data/ai-models. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.