Онлайн
The Moon · Statio

Statio Shiv Shakti

Compound word from Indian philosophy that depicts the masculine (“Shiva”) and feminine (“Shakti”) duality of nature; Landing site of Chandrayaan-3’s Vikram lander.

What Statio Shiv Shakti is

Statio Shiv Shakti is a statio — a landing site — the only class named after a human arrival — on The Moon, centred at 69.4° S, 32.3° E in the Manzinus quadrangle.

Where the name comes from

Compound word from Indian philosophy that depicts the masculine (“Shiva”) and feminine (“Shakti”) duality of nature; Landing site of Chandrayaan-3’s Vikram lander. The International Astronomical Union approved the name in 2024, under the theme it applies to every statio on The Moon. Of the 4 features of this class catalogued on The Moon, the naming categories run China (3), Latin (1).

Feature class
a landing site — the only class named after a human arrival
Diameter
Not catalogued
Coordinates
69.4° S, 32.3° E
Planetocentric, on The Moon
Name approved
2024
By the IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature
Quadrangle
Manzinus
Map sheet on The Moon
Naming category
India
Asia

What it would take to settle Statio Shiv Shakti

The Moon scores 29.1 as a world. That number is the same for every square metre of it — but sunlight, water, radiation and the ground under your feet are not. This is the same question asked at 69.4° S, 32.3° E.

Settlement difficulty here
30/ 100
Typical for this world
The Moon overall
29.1
0.9 harder than the median site
Ranked
1177th
of 2,023 named places on The Moon

What this spot has going for it is ground flat ground — the easiest thing to land on and build across. What works against it is water outside the ice-bearing latitudes.

Computed from Statio Shiv Shakti's catalogued latitude, longitude and feature class — 84% of the model's weight had a basis here, and one axis was dropped as not applicable to The Moon (radiation geometry). Gravity, pressure, delta-v and distance from the Sun are the same everywhere on The Moon and are already counted in the world's own index, not again here.

What this cannot see: elevation. Slope, local shadowing and the polar “peaks of eternal light” — ridge tops near the poles of a barely tilted world that catch sun almost continuously while a crater floor kilometres away never does — need a terrain model this does not have. Where a real mission targets a pole, that is usually why.

What is next to it

The largest statio features on The Moon