En vivo
Ceres · Labyrinthus · 107th largest named feature

Makahiki Labyrinthus

Hawaiian harvest festival in honor of Lono, a god of fertility, agriculture, and rainfall (lasts four months, from October through February).

What Makahiki Labyrinthus is

Makahiki Labyrinthus is a labyrinthus — a complex of intersecting valleys or ridges — on Ceres, 22 km across, centred at 17.5° N, 122.2° W. It is the 107th largest named feature on Ceres and the 1st largest of its class there.

Where the name comes from

Hawaiian harvest festival in honor of Lono, a god of fertility, agriculture, and rainfall (lasts four months, from October through February). The International Astronomical Union approved the name in 2019.

Feature class
a complex of intersecting valleys or ridges
Diameter
22 km
about the length of Manhattan
Coordinates
17.5° N, 122.2° W
Planetocentric, on Ceres
Name approved
2019
By the IAU Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature
Naming category
Hawaii
Oceania

What it would take to settle Makahiki Labyrinthus

Ceres scores 43.8 as a world. That number is the same for every square metre of it — but sunlight, water, radiation and the ground under your feet are not. This is the same question asked at 17.5° N, 122.2° W.

Settlement difficulty here
44.4/ 100
Typical for this world
Ceres overall
43.8
0.6 harder than the median site
Ranked
103rd
of 149 named places on Ceres

What this spot has going for it is sunlight 95% of the sunlight the sunniest latitude on Ceres gets. What works against it is ground broken ground — hard to reach, and worth reaching for the shelter and the exposed strata.

Computed from Makahiki Labyrinthus's catalogued latitude, longitude and feature class — 68% of the model's weight had a basis here, and 3 axes were dropped as not applicable to Ceres (radiation geometry, earth link, known ground). Gravity, pressure, delta-v and distance from the Sun are the same everywhere on Ceres and are already counted in the world's own index, not again here.

What this cannot see: elevation. Slope, local shadowing and the polar “peaks of eternal light” — ridge tops near the poles of a barely tilted world that catch sun almost continuously while a crater floor kilometres away never does — need a terrain model this does not have. Where a real mission targets a pole, that is usually why.

What is next to it